Hyperlite Mountain Gear Southwest Review
A waterproof Dyneema roll-top with aluminum stays and snag-proof solid pockets, the Southwest is built for hikers who keep loads near 30 lb.
Overview
The Hyperlite Mountain Gear Southwest is the brand’s rough-country pack: a roll-top Dyneema tube with a light aluminum-stay frame, and the only pack in the Windrider/Junction family with solid-fabric exterior pockets instead of mesh. It comes as a 40L (the 2400) and a 55L (the 3400), and it suits experienced ultralight hikers who keep loads near 30 lb. The trade-off is familiar HMG territory: bombproof construction and weather protection, but no load lifters, almost no ventilation, and a price north of $350.
Key Specs
| Spec | Detail |
|---|---|
| Weight | 853–916 g depending on version and size |
| Internal Volume | 40L (2,400 cu in) or 55L (3,400 cu in) |
| External Volume | 9.8L (600 cu in), all versions |
| Material | Dyneema® Woven Composite 3.9 (200-denier) on the current build |
| Frame | Two removable, contoured aluminum stays |
| Back Panel | 1/4” foam pad |
| Hip Belt | Dual-density foam with spacer mesh; zippered hip belt pockets |
| Closure | Roll-top with side compression straps and top Y-strap |
| Rated Load | Up to 40 lb |
| Torso Sizes | Small, Medium, Large, Tall |
Versions compared
| Image | Version | Weight | vs. lightest |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Original 40 | 853 g (30.1 oz) | lightest |
![]() | Original | 896 g (31.6 oz) | +43 g |
![]() | 2400 Large | 916 g (32.3 oz) | +63 g |
Build your Gear Closet
View all of your gear in one place, create packing lists and hit the trail with confidence. Available on iOS, Android and the web.
Get StartedPerformance
The fabric. The current Southwest uses Dyneema Woven Composite 3.9 in place of the older Dyneema Composite Hybrid. HMG positions it as roughly as light as the hybrid it replaces, with markedly better abrasion and tear resistance than the heavier 5.9. Testers who ran the pack through multi-night trips and summit pushes in Baxter State Park, in conditions from steady rain to dry granite, came away impressed. Durability was rarely the complaint with earlier HMG packs, so the practical gain is modest. The more noticeable change is tactile: a matte finish and less of the crinkly rattle that old Dyneema packs make in cold weather.
White and black versions now share the same fabric and price, though black costs more weight: 979 g against 896 g in the 55L Medium.
Weather resistance. The fabric is waterproof and the vertical side seams are taped. In soak tests the main compartment stayed essentially dry. Roll-top packs still admit water at the opening in sustained downpours, so most owners keep sleeping bags in a dry bag or liner. Owners of older packs reported a little water seeping in where the shoulder straps are sewn to the body after extended heavy rain. HMG has revised the construction since.
Carry and comfort. The two aluminum stays do most of the structural work, sending weight to a dual-density hip belt that reviewers call stable for its weight. The shoulder straps are thin but dense. They stay comfortable under moderate loads, but pressure points appear past about 30 lb. Switchback Travel’s tester logged long days at up to 30 lb on the 40L with no hot spots, and CleverHiker named the 40L its best all-around backpack, praising the frame’s weight transfer. Others find the 40 lb rating optimistic, and one Trailspace reviewer judged it likely overrated. A longtime reviewer at The Hiking Life vouched for 40 lb in demanding conditions, though he noted that few hikers’ kits will ever reach that weight. The redesigned straps curve more around the neck, which answers a long-running fit complaint.
The missing piece is load lifters. Many competing ultralight packs now include them, and they help at 25 lb and above, especially for hikers with less muscular trapezius muscles. Without them, the shoulders take the strain at the heavy end of the range.
Organization. The layout is one large roll-top compartment, three exterior pockets, and two hip belt pockets, with no front access and no dividers. The solid Dyneema pockets are the Southwest’s signature: no mesh to shred on brush, cactus, or talus. The latest pockets are deeper, with lower rear edges that make bottles easier to reach and hold loose gear more securely. The hip belt pockets are among the roomier ones on ultralight packs and take a phone and snacks. The roll-top’s Velcro can snag on clothing.
Ventilation. There isn’t any. The foam back panel is fine in cool and mild weather, but hot days mean a sweaty back. That’s the price of the weight and the waterproofing.
Choosing a Version
All three versions share the frame, hip belt, three solid pockets, and 9.8L of external volume. What changes is the main compartment and, slightly, the torso length and weight.
Original 40 (853 g). The smaller pack is for short overnights, section hikes with frequent resupply, and desert or canyon routes where durability matters more than capacity. It also works as a winter day pack. CleverHiker’s testers favor the 40L for three- to five-day trips, with the caveat that their kit is compact and dialed in. A bear canister and a week of food will not fit. At under 2 lb, it sits in a small group of capable framed packs.
Original 55L (896 g). The extra 15 liters cost about 43 g and buy room for longer food carries, bulkier quilts, and a bear can. The roll-top can be rolled down far enough to make the 55 behave like the 40 on lighter trips, so it is the more forgiving choice if trip lengths vary. It is the version most thru-hikers pick, and it is the one that costs $399.
2400 Large (916 g). This is the 40L pack cut for longer torsos. It carries the same 2,400 cu in main compartment as the Original 40 but weighs 63 g more, and 20 g more than the 55L Original. Weight climbs with size across the line, so taller hikers should expect that penalty rather than treat it as a flaw. Hikers with long backs should fit by torso length first and volume second. A correctly sized Large will carry noticeably better than a Medium stretched past its range.
Hikers running a fully dialed ultralight kit on resupply-heavy routes can go with a 40. Everyone else should take the 55L.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fully waterproof Dyneema body with taped seams
- Solid Dyneema exterior pockets that resist snags, tears, and brush
- Removable aluminum stays give real structure for under a pound of pack weight
- Roll-top adapts to changing load volumes
- Large hip belt pockets
- Four torso sizes
- Reports of thousands of miles of use on the PCT and Colorado Trail
Cons
- No load lifters, which limits comfort above 25–30 lb
- Thin padding, and no adjustability beyond the four torso sizes
- No back ventilation
- Velcro on the roll-top can snag
- The 40L is tight for anything beyond short, resupply-friendly trips
- $399 for the 55L is steep, even if longevity eventually justifies it
Who Should Buy This
Hikers with a lightweight kit already sorted (tent, quilt, pad, and cook system) will get the most out of the Southwest. It suits wet-weather trips, off-trail routes through brush and talus, and anyone who has lost a water bottle through a shredded mesh pocket. Beginners still building a lighter kit should upgrade the tent and sleeping bag first. Anyone routinely carrying more than 35 lb, or with shoulder or trap problems, should look at a pack with load lifters.
Verdict
The Southwest isn’t the freshest design in the category, but the woven Dyneema upgrade, reshaped straps, and deeper pockets show it has been maintained rather than left to coast. The missing load lifters keep it from being a universal recommendation. For an experienced ultralight hiker who holds loads to around 30 lb, it remains a benchmark: choose the 55L for most trips, and the 40L only if the kit is truly compact.

